Company

Security, demystified.

Cyberplane builds Circuit for security teams who already own capable tools — and need them to act together, safely, with proof.

Circuit is in development. We’re proving it in our lab and inviting design partners to shape it.

Our mission

Turn fragmented security knowledge into coordinated, verified action — through the controls security teams already own.

What we believe

The principles we build by.

Context before action

Material risk lives across systems. Decisions should rest on joined-up evidence, not on one tool’s view.

People approve; policy bounds automation

Start with recommendations and human approval. Automate only actions that are explicitly permitted, bounded and preferably reversible.

Verification isn’t optional

An accepted request is not a fixed problem. Success means the intended change is confirmed at the source.

Vendor neutral by design

We integrate with the controls you’ve chosen instead of asking you to replace them.

Your evidence, your key

The record of what happened belongs to you, and its integrity can be checked without trusting us.

Ingest what decisions need

We don’t centralize all of your raw telemetry. Focused context keeps cost, exposure and noise down.

Focus

What we’re deliberately not building.

Focus is a feature. Circuit sits between your tools; it isn’t another platform to rip and replace. Your existing controls remain the sources of context and the points of enforcement.

  • SIEM
  • EDR
  • Firewall
  • IAM platform
  • CNAPP
  • Generic SOAR replacement
  • Full CTEM platform
  • BAS platform
  • Broad AI-agent-security platform
Where we’re headed

Prove one loop. Then widen it.

We’re proving one thing first: that Circuit can take fragmented context, identify a material exposure, make a defensible decision, cause an existing control to act — and prove the risk reduction actually happened.

  1. 1 First

    Identity-led exposure interruption

    Show that a material identity-to-asset path can be identified, interrupted and verified end to end.

  2. 2 Next

    More enforcement surfaces and AI agents

    The same graph, policy, intervention and verification foundation supports the next use case.

  3. 3 Then

    A reusable cross-domain control plane

    New use cases arrive through entities, policies and connectors — not new product architecture.

Let’s talk.

Security leaders, technology partners and people who’d like to build with us — we’d like to hear from you.